← all organisations

Digital-Intelligence-Unit / Overview

5 public repositories, 12.7k commits, 2 committers, 2011–2026.

Every public repository in github.com/Digital-Intelligence-Unit was mirror-cloned in full and mined from its git history rather than the GitHub API alone. This site reports what 5 repositories, 12.7k commits and 2 people actually did.

The estate at a glance

5
public repositories
2 are forks of other projects
2
not archived
3 archived (60% of the estate)
12.7k
commits analysed
across 5 repositories with history
2
distinct human committers
plus 0 automated identities
329.6 MB
of git data
full mirrors, every branch and tag
15
languages detected
34.7 MB of source
15
years of history
org created February 2011
0%
of commits are bots
dependency bots and CI identities

What stands out

Roughly 60% of the estate is archived.

3 of 5 repositories are read-only. The live estate is the 2 repositories that remain, and only those are a fair basis for judging current practice.

1 live repositories have not been touched since 2023.

They are not archived, so they still read as supported, but 50% of the active estate has had no push in over two years. This is the gap between 'archived' and 'actually maintained' - the population where dependency drift accumulates unobserved.

Shape of the estate

Repository status

Archived repositories are read-only. GDS archives aggressively, which is healthier than the alternative but makes the raw repository count a poor measure of the live system.

Active fork: 2 (40.0%)40%Active forkArchived: 3 (60.0%)60%Archived
  • Active, own code
  • Active fork of a third party
  • Archived (read-only)

Repositories created each year

The 2017 peak coincides with the GaaP era - Notify, Pay, Registers - and a wave of departmental prototyping.

32.21.50.8022: 32223: 12324: 124

Year of last push

A decay curve. The 2026 spike is the live estate; everything left of it has stopped moving.

32.21.50.8022: 32223: 12325: 125

Volume of work

Commits per year, from git history

Measured from the commits themselves across every branch and tag, not from GitHub's activity graph.

1.6k1.2k812.5406.2014: 3631415: 1.5k1516: 1.3k1617: 1.2k1718: 1.2k1819: 1k1920: 9692021: 8952122: 1.4k2223: 1.3k2324: 1.6k2425: 425

The same history, month by month

Monthly resolution shows the texture the yearly view flattens: the long climb to the mid-2010s peak, the plateau, and the bot-driven noise of the Dependabot era. The busiest single month was 2014-11 with 245 commits.

245183.8122.561.20: 11: 245: 1072015-01: 67: 102: 161: 189: 199: 154: 87: 139: 104: 121: 149: 712016-01: 67: 92: 110: 111: 148: 113: 65: 140: 149: 109: 115: 582017-01: 78: 69: 124: 127: 126: 124: 83: 126: 90: 83: 103: 1052018-01: 118: 124: 118: 73: 80: 62: 78: 95: 102: 144: 123: 482019-01: 101: 93: 117: 115: 63: 88: 71: 64: 61: 87: 85: 622020-01: 66: 56: 81: 82: 112: 97: 93: 107: 98: 72: 44: 612021-01: 61: 71: 60: 80: 85: 64: 67: 90: 65: 97: 90: 652022-01: 70: 108: 116: 146: 159: 156: 76: 108: 130: 105: 108: 942023-01: 102: 79: 105: 92: 72: 99: 148: 141: 150: 124: 92: 672024-01: 59: 110: 153: 200: 146: 166: 117: 155: 139: 164: 134: 82: 3: 1

Languages

Primary language, by repository count

GitHub's headline language per repository. Ruby is the house language of GOV.UK publishing; Python dominates the data and alerting estate.

JavaScriptJavaScript: 22RR: 11TypeScriptTypeScript: 11JavaJava: 11

What GDS built

GDS has never been one product. Repository names carry the programme they were built for, and those prefixes outlive the programmes themselves – which makes them the clearest surviving record of what the organisation worked on, and when it stopped.

Repositories per programme

Classified by naming convention. 'Other / experimental' is the long tail of prototypes, spikes and one-off tools.

Other / experimentalOther / experimental: 33Forked third-partyForked third-party: 22

GitHub topics, as set by GDS itself

An independent check on the classification above: topics are applied by hand, and 0 of 5 repositories (0%) carry at least one. The ranking closely tracks the name-derived programmes, which is reassuring for both.

Commits per year, by programme

The rise and fall of each programme, measured in actual commits rather than announcements.

1.6k1.2k812.5406.2011121314 - Forked third-party: 3631415 - Forked third-party: 1.5k1516 - Forked third-party: 1.3k1617 - Forked third-party: 1.2k1718 - Forked third-party: 1.2k1819 - Forked third-party: 1k1920 - Forked third-party: 9692021 - Forked third-party: 8952122 - Other / experimental: 14522 - Forked third-party: 1.2k2223 - Forked third-party: 1.3k2324 - Forked third-party: 1.6k2425 - Forked third-party: 42526
  • Other / experimental
  • Forked third-party

Programme life-spans

The period covering the middle 98% of each programme's commits. Deliberately not first-to-last commit: Emergency Alerts was built from the Notify codebase and inherited a stray 2011 commit with it, which made both programmes appear to start a decade before they existed. Trimming the tails ignores inherited and vendored history and answers the question actually being asked – when was this being worked on.

201120132015201720192021202320252027Forked third-partyForked third-party: sustained activity 2014 to 2024, 2 repositories, 12.6k commitsOther / experimentalOther / experimental: sustained activity 2022 to 2022, 3 repositories, 145 commits